| 000 | 01132cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57192 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u79191 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | _aReflections of discontent | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9725) 21 June 1997, 135-136(2) |
||
| 520 | _aIllustrates how difficult it is for aggrieved parties to mount a successful challenge to planning decisions made by the SoS Environment by means of four recent cases "West Midlands Probation Committee v SoS Environment", "Scott v SoS Environment", "Buckley v SoS Environment" and "Knott v SoS Environment" (WB3244-30). | ||
| 650 | _aBUCKLEY V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aKNOTT V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING DECISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING OBJECTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSCOTT V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aWEST MIDLANDS PROBATION COMMITTEE V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/06/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49781 _d49781 |
||