| 000 | 00978cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3326-28 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u79379 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLandlord and tenant: break clause | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1997] EGCS 97 (28/6/97) |
||
| 520 | _a"Nocton Ltd v Water Hall Group" ChD 19 June 1997. The owner of a quarry granted a lease to a tenant containing a clause entitling the tenant to break the lease when all limestone `capable of extraction has been removed`. Once the limestone became uneconomical to extract the tenant gave notice. The tenant contended that `capable of extraction` meant economically rather than physically capable. Judgment for the landlord. | ||
| 650 | _aBREAK CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aNOCTON LTD V WATER HALL GROUP PLC | ||
| 650 | _aQUARRY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c02/07/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49890 _d49890 |
||