000			01470cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS57376
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u79589
041			_aeng
245			_aPearce v Ove Arup Partnership Ltd & others
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v[1997] 3 All ER 31-44(14)
520			_aChD 7 March 1997. In 1986 P created drawings as part of a diploma exercise. The action was against O, a firm of UK civil engineers, and three other parties from Holland, who together formed the planning and design team for a dutch building built between 1990 and 1993. P claimed that his plans had been reproduced in this construction. The dutch defendants applied to strike out the claim on grounds that a breach of foreign copyright was not justiciable in English courts. P contended that it was justiciable under law covered by the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982. "Held" that whilst jurisdiction was allowed, the action would be struck out against all defendants as an abuse of process - the evidence being purely speculative.
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN
650			_aCIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGEMENTS ACT 1982
650			_aCOPYRIGHT
650			_aEVIDENCE
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aPEARCE V OVE ARUP PARTNERSHIP LTD AND OTHERS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c14/07/1997
999			_c50050 _d50050