| 000 | 00907cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54061 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u8211 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aDurrant, L. | ||
| 245 | _aCommunal aerial and satellite dish facility | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vNovember 1995, 997-1001(5) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines in detail the reasons behind an appeal decision that concluded a communal aerial and satellite dish facility was not a reasonable requirement on a low-cost housing development. The dispute was between Horsham DC and Higgs and Hill Homes. | ||
| 650 | _aAERIALS | ||
| 650 | _aHIGGS AND HILL | ||
| 650 | _aHORSHAM DC | ||
| 650 | _aLOW-COST HOUSING | ||
| 650 | _aPPG8 | ||
| 650 | _aSATELLITE DISHES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c5021 _d5021 |
||