| 000 | 01215cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3026-33 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u79989 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1994) EGCS 116(1) (2/7/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"SoS Environment v Euston Centre Investments Ltd" CA 24 June 1994. Successful appeal against a decision to allow the landlord`s case to strike out for want of prosecution the tenant`s application for leave to appeal under Arbitration Act 1979 s1 the arbitrator`s rent review determination. It was not necessary to establish prejudice to the other party in order to have an application struck out. The aim of the Act was to foster prompt arbitration proceedings; however, unusual delays in this case were taken into account. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1979 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aDELAY | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aSTRIKE OUT APPLICATION | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50340 _d50340 |
||