| 000 | 00973cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57490 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u80283 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aConway, K | ||
| 245 | _aEarly closing daze | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9732) 9 August 1997, 76-78(3) |
||
| 520 | _aThe Argyll ruling makes it harder for landlords to enforce keep open covenants, but as the law evolves tenants must still fear claims for damages. Considers, in the light of the judgement, use of orders for specific performance and injunctions as a remedy for breach of a keep open covenant. | ||
| 650 | _aCO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD V ARGYLL STORES (HOLDINGS) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aINJUNCTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aKEEP OPEN COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aREMEDIES | ||
| 650 | _aSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c14/08/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50548 _d50548 |
||