| 000 | 01200cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57416 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u80314 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aExtrudakerb (Maltby Engineering) Ltd v White Mountains Quarries Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal _vJuly 1997, 262-270(9) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 24 April 1996. Concerns a sub contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to lay some water channels for the defendant, the main contractor. A letter by the defendant stated that this subcontract would be the FCEC form of subcontract which contains an arbitration clause. Disputes arose and the plaintiff commenced court proceedings claiming payment for work done and charges allegedly due under the subcontract. The defendant sought a stay to arbitration but the plaintiff appealed on the grounds that the contract did not contain an arbitration clause. "Held". | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aFCEC FORM OF SUBCONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTS | ||
| 690 | _aARBITRATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c18/08/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50576 _d50576 |
||