000 01299cab a2200217 4500
001 X86192
008 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u80604
041 _aeng
245 _aReigate and Banstead BC and Wray
260 _c1997
350 _a0
490 _aPlanning Appeal Decisions
_v[1997] 12 PAD 332-342(11)
520 _aHearing 4 June 1997. Enforcement notices-use of agricultural land for storage/parking, breaking and repair of motor vehicles-first decision letter remitted by High Court to SoS for re-hearing and re-determination-unit of occupation-composite use-planning unit-accuracy of description of breach-whether possible to correct allegations in notices without injustice-deemed applications-Structure and Local Plans-character and appearance of area-visual and residential amenities-traffic generation-access-external storage-conditions-requirements of notices-compliance period. Costs-whether Council had been unreasonable in not withdrawing 1991 notices and relying on earlier notices. Taken from headnote.
650 _aPROPERTY-RURAL AND NATURAL ASSETS-AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY-AGRICULTURAL LAND
650 _aCOSTS
650 _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
690 _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942 _n0
948 _c01/09/1997
999 _c50737
_d50737