| 000 | 01031cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X86294 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u80706 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Sandhu | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1997 JPL 853-860(8) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 December 1996. Listed buisling - severely deteriorated - unauthorised works effected - prosecution and conviction - Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s9(1) - strict liability offence - evidence adduced as to attitude and demeanoir of defendant reat emphasis placed by judge in summing up on the motives of the defendant - convictions quashed - evidence adduced irrelevant, inadmissable and prejudicial. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATION | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aR V SANDHU | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c08/09/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50808 _d50808 |
||