| 000 | 01586cab a2200325 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57679 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u80882 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBlezard, R. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe implications behind some of the recent case law affecting land | |
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aFarmland Market _v(48) Autumn 1997, 18-19(2) |
||
| 520 | _aReviews recent case law concerning farmland. Highlights contentious points. Includes milk quota decisions. "Harries v Barclays Bank plc" where a bank having appointed a receiver sold the dairy herd. The claim was that the legal charge did not extend to the quota; appeal dismissed. "Wace v Bourke" concerns the structuring of arrangements for retirement and the disposal of milk quota. "Davies v H & R Ecroyd Ltd" which decided that milk quota was not an asset of the partnership. "Earl D`Kerlast" a decision on the legal formalities behind a transaction which concluded that the arrangement amounted to a form of illicit quota leasing. | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aDAVIES V H & R ECROYD LTD | ||
| 650 | _aEARL D`KERLAST | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aHARRIES V BARCLAYS BANK | ||
| 650 | _aJOHN V GEORGE AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aMILK QUOTAS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO QUIT | ||
| 650 | _aWACE V BOURKE | ||
| 650 | _aWALLACE V C BRIAN BARRETT & SON LTD | ||
| 650 | _aYEANDLE V RYEGATE AND BANSTEAD BC AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c15/09/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50933 _d50933 |
||