| 000 | 01113cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57634 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u80913 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLangdon, M. | ||
| 245 | _aCommercial sense wins in war of words | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v60(12) 12 September 1997, 26-27(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the CA decision in "Dukeminster (Ebbgate House One) Ltd v Somerfield Property Co Ltd" in which the rent review provisions gave the landlord an option to secure market rent of the actual premises or a percentage of market rent on a notional premises defined as a warehouse `within a 35-mile radius of Ross-on-Wye`. Considers the decision from the landlord and tenant perspective. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aDUKEMINSTER (EBBGATE HOUSE ONE) LTD V SOMERFIELD PROPERTY CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNOTIONAL PREMISES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c17/09/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c50958 _d50958 |
||