| 000 | 01181cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3026-48 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u81032 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMagistrate`s jurisdiction | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _vJuly 1994, 15(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Hackney LBC v Mott and Fairman" QBD 8 June 1994. The ratepayers were not informed within the proper time period of an alteration to the valuation list and they claimed the entry in the list was invalid. H sought a liability order. In deciding the issue of the liability order, the magistrate had no jurisdiction to determine validity of an entry in the non-domestic rating list. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATION | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 650 | _aMAGISTRATES | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC RATING (ALTERATION OF LISTS AND APPEALS) REGS | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC RATING (COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT) REGULATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC RATING | ||
| 650 | _aNOTIFICATION | ||
| 650 | _aRATING LIST | ||
| 650 | _aSI 1989:1056 | ||
| 650 | _aSI 1990:582 | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c51053 _d51053 |
||