| 000 | 01376cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57786 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u81497 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aJarrett and another v Barclays Bank Plc and another; Jones and another v First National Bank Plc; Peacock and another v First National Bank Plc. | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v[1997] 3 WLR 654-666(13) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 31 October 1996. The plaintiffs (P) entered agreements to buy timeshare properties abroad using finance provided by the defendant banks. P claimed the vendors guilty of misrepresentation and breach of contract and commenced action against the banks. Banks applied to strike out actions on ground that proceedings had as their object tenancies of immovable property and therefore foreign courts had exclusive jurisdiction. In the first two actions the claims were struck out, but in the third the application to strike out was refused. Held, the P appeals in the first two actions were allowed, and the bank`s appeal in the third action was dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBANKS | ||
| 650 | _aCONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 | ||
| 650 | _aFINANCE | ||
| 650 | _aIMMOVABLE PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aMISREPRESENTATION | ||
| 650 | _aTIMESHARE PROPERTY | ||
| 690 | _aLAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c16/10/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c51343 _d51343 |
||