| 000 | 00963cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57790 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u81707 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTye v House and another | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[1997] 41 EG 160-161(2) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 17 June 1997. The plaintiff alleged a lock-out agreement had been agreed to over the purchase of a golf course. After the defendants received a higher offer which they were minded to accept, the plaintiff obtained an ex parte injunction restraining them from exchanging or completing a contract of sale. Held: the injunction would be discharged - damages would be an appropriate remedy. | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aEXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aGOLF COURSE | ||
| 650 | _aINJUNCTION | ||
| 650 | _aLOCK-OUT AGREEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aLAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c28/10/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c51509 _d51509 |
||