000			01299cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS57819
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u81910
041			_aeng
245			_aKennedy v Emden; Jordan v Gershon Young Finer & Green; Burdge and another v Jacobs and others
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[1997] 44 EG 201-205(5)
520			_aCA 27 March 1996. The respective plaintiffs (P) acquired unexpired terms of leases of flats in the same building. Each paid substantial premiums. The P were claiming damages against the defendant solicitors for failure to advise that the premiums were unlawful having regard to the provisions of Part IX of the Rent Act 1977. The P claimed damages on the diminution in value basis. They appealed the decision of the judge below who held that diminution in value rule ought not to be applied and that damages ought to be assessed at the date of the trial. Held: the appeals were dismissed.
650			_aDIMINUTION IN VALUE
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aPREMIUMS
650			_aPROTECTED TENANCIES
650			_aRENT ACT 1977
650			_aUNDERLEASES
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/11/1997
999			_c51651 _d51651