000			01393cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS52507
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u82472
041			_aeng
245			_aJaggard v Sawyer and another
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 13 EG 132-140(9)
520			_aCA 18 July 1994. Both parties were resident in a private cul-de-sac, where all houses were bound by restrictive covenants that unbuilt land could be used only for gardens. S purchased land behind the family home, obtained permission and commenced building another house for which access was to be over the existing garden. J, the plaintiff, opposed this development, arguing that access over the private road amounted to trespass, there being no right of way. At first instance it was "held" that this was the case and there had been a breach of covenant, but the judge awarded damages rather than grant an injunction. J appealed, but the earlier decision was upheld.
650			_aJAGGARD V SAWYER AND ANOTHER
650			_aCHANCERY AMENDMENT ACT 1968
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aRIGHT OF WAY
650			_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO LTD 1895
650			_aWROTHAM PARK ESTATE CO LTD V PARKSIDE HOMES LTD
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c52079 _d52079