| 000 | 01245cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52508 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u82540 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMercury Communications Ltd v London and India Dock Investments Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v1995 69 P&CR 135-169(35) |
||
| 520 | _aCC 10 June 1993. Application under the `Telecommunications Code` in the Telecommunications Act 1984 Sched 2 to determine fair and reasonable compensation. Compulsory purchase `Pointe Gourde` and "Stoke v Cambridge" principles dismissed. The agreements entered between the two parties for installation of previous ducts established annual fees rather than capital payments. A sum of £9000 per annum was determined. | ||
| 650 | _aANNUAL PAYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCAPITAL PAYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aEASEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR AND REASONABLE | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVATE ROADS | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1984 SCHED 2 | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS CODE | ||
| 650 | _aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52115 _d52115 |
||