| 000 | 01033cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X88184 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u82565 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCrewe Services and Investment Corporation v Silk | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v[1997] NPC 170, (3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 2 December 1997. An agricultural landlord, who is able to sue for breach of repairing covenant during the tenancy recovers damages based on the discounted costs of putting the property back in order. The court discusses principles of general application for assessing damage to the reversion and comments on how County Court Judges should approach this task. Taken from report header. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED. | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCREWE SERVICES AND INVESTMENT V SILK | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c09/12/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52137 _d52137 |
||