000			01110cab a2200181 4500
001			WB2513-26
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u82895
041			_aeng
245			_aDamages for misrepresentation
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1989 48
520			_aIn CEMP Properties (UK) Ltd v Dentsply Research and Development Corporation and another No 2 , ChD 21 March 1989, the second defendants` submission that they should not be required to indemnify the first defendants for any damage paid to the plaintiffs (the difference between the price paid by the plaintiffs and the true market value) was accepted. Indemnification could not be awarded under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 as there was no reason for believing the relationship between first and second defendants was other than a normal client and solicitor conveyancing relationship in which it would be absurd if the solicitor owed a duty of care to the other party to the conveyance.
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c52351 _d52351