| 000 | 01343cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58078 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u82908 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCurtis v London Rent Assessment Committee and others | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v[1997] 4 All ER 842-870(29) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 9 October 1997. C owned two flats for which fair rents were determined in 1993. In 1995 C referred the assessment of rents to R, relying on seven nearby market comparables. R accepted four of these, but concluded by having regard to the 1993 rents and their own general knowledge of comparable registered rents, that an earlier rent officer`s registration to be held. C`s appeal allowed and R`s decision quashed, but with the judge finding that R could have reasonably come to their decision but that the reasons given were inadequate. C appealed, contending that the judge`s reasoning was wrong. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLE RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCURTIS AND OTHERS V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR RENT DETERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR RENT | ||
| 650 | _aMARKET RENT COMAPRABLES | ||
| 650 | _aREGISTERED RENTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c24/12/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52364 _d52364 |
||