000			01369cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS58191
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u83297
041			_aeng
245			_aChurch Commissioners for England v Baines; Ebied and another v Hopkins and another; Wellcome Trust Ltd v Hammad
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9802) 10 January 1998, 121-127(7)
520			_aCA 30 July 1997. In each of the appeals the premises consisted of a shop or business premises with residential floors above. Each had been the subject of a headlease protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II with subtenancies protected by the Rent Act 1977 of the residential parts held by the respective appellant subtenants. Upon the determination of each of the headleases, orders of possession were made against the subtenants upon the applications of the freeholders. The subtenants appealed contending that by reason of the Rent Act 1977 s137(3) they had the protection of the Act against the freeholders. Appeals allowed.
650			_aFLATS ABOVE SHOPS
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650			_aRENT ACT 1977
650			_aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES
650			_aSUBTENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c26/01/1998
999			_c52600 _d52600