| 000 | 01080cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3404-31 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u83382 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aResidential subtenants of business tenants | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9804) 24 January 1998, 148(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses a recent Court of Appeal case that overturned the decision in "Pittalis v Grant" that Rent Act-protected subtenants could be removed once the business tenancies from which they had been created came to an end. | ||
| 650 | _aBROMLEY PARK GARDEN ESTATES LTD V GEORGE | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCHURCH COMMISSIONERS FOR ENGLAND V BAINES | ||
| 650 | _aEBIED V HOPKINS | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PT II | ||
| 650 | _aPITTALIS V GRANT | ||
| 650 | _aPROTECTED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 S137(3) | ||
| 650 | _aSUBTENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aWELLCOME TRUST LTD V HAMMAD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c28/01/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c52666 _d52666 |
||