000			01494cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS58203
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u83468
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Aylesbury DC and Price, ex parte Chaplin
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1998] JPL 48-55(8)
520			_aCA 31 July 1997. An application was submitted for planning permission to build two houses at Barracks Farm, Bucks. The Planning Officer reported to the Development Control Sub-Committee of the Aylesbury Vale DC that the site lay within the development boundary of the village and the proposed development would comply with the relevant policy in the Rural Areas Local Plan (RH6). The sub-committee refused against the Planning Officer`s advice. After appeal a public inquiry was arranged. The planning department suggested in view of the forthcoming inquiry, members of the sub-committee should visit the site. After the site visit the applicant was advised to reapply and permission was granted without any reason given for the reverse of the earlier decision. The applicants appealed against the grant of planning permission because the earlier had been dismissed without reasons given. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aREVERSAL OF DECISION
650			_aRURAL AREA LOCAL PLAN
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c02/02/1998
999			_c52718 _d52718