000			01588cab a2200229 4500
001			X83469
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u83469
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Teesside Development Corporation, ex parte William Morrison Supermarket plc and Redcar and Cleveland BC
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1998] JPL 23-48(26)
520			_aQBD 16 May 1997. A site in an urban development area and subject to control by Teesside Development Corporation was targeted for an extensive development proposal package for residential and commercial purposes including a major food retail unit. Such a retail development was in direct breach of Policy IND7 in the Cleveland Structure Plan which nominated Middlehaven for such a development. Asda made an initial planning permission application which was approved subject to an impact assessment. This assessment showed an at least 25 per cent impact on William Morrison Supermarket`s store nearby. The corporation still resolved to support the application but Redcar and Cleveland BC opposed the development because of the conflict with the Structure Plan. They and William Morrison Supermarket plc alleged that the Corporation had lacked objectivity and prejudged the outcome of its deliberations. Application allowed.
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPREJUDICED
650			_aRETAIL DEVELOPMENT
650			_aSTRUCTURE PLAN
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c02/02/1998
999			_c52719 _d52719