| 000 | 01253cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3406-32 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u84182 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aPlanning permission | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1998) EGCS 12, (1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Bannertown Developments Ltd v SoS of the Environment" QBD 22 January 1998. Planning permission was sought for retail parks in Cirencester by applicant and third respondant. SoS called-in both applications to be determined. The inspector at the inquiry recommended the applications to be refused. SoS accepted inspector`s recommendation, refusing applications, though not agreeing with all reasons. Applicant appealed under Town & Country Planning Act 1990 s288, contending that SoS had not used "sufficient doubt" test under PPG6 and structure plan policy S2 regarding retail impact. Appeal against decision allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aBANNERTOWN DEVELOPMENTS LTD V SOS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE SIX | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL | ||
| 650 | _aRETAIL PARK | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c11/02/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c52896 _d52896 |
||