| 000 | 01369cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52548 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u84215 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHemingway Securities Ltd v Dunraven Ltd and another | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 9 EG 322-324(3) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 16 August 1994. D, the defendant, held premises on a lease containing a covenant not to assign without the landlord`s consent, and by which any subtenant would be required to enter a direct covenant with H, the landlord, according to a sublease likewise approved. D, however, executed a sublease in favour of the second defendants. H therefore sought injunctions against D for breach of contract and against the second defendant for inducing the breach. H contended that the lease clause in question was a restrictive covenant. The court agreed and "held" that there had been a clear breach. H`s application allowed and an injunction requiring surrender of sublease granted. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aHEMINGWAY SECURITIES LTD V DUNRAVEN LTD AND ANOTHER 1994 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBLEASES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52917 _d52917 |
||