| 000 | 01319cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52550 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u84286 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aScarlett v Halcrow Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 11 EG 145-148(4) |
||
| 520 | _aLVT 14 November 1995. S wished to purchase a block of 10 flats and sought a determination of price from the court, proposing a sum of £3,000. H replied with a notice for £30,000 or £15,000 plus leaseback of the roof area for further development. "Held" that the price should be £1,500, there being no neighbouring property for which the landlord would be compensatable under the Leashold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993; there being no marriage value; and as permission for development would be refused, there was no loss of development value. | ||
| 650 | _aDETERMINATION OF PRICE | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aFREEHOLD INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aGODALMING | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aMARRIAGE VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aSCARLETT V HALCROW LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52960 _d52960 |
||