| 000 | 01121cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52551 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u84316 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBickenhall Engineering Co Ltd v Grandmet Restaurants Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 10 EG 123-129(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 29 July 1995. G, the appellant, held premises on a lease from B, where the rent review clause provided for a market rent to be set by the landlord, provided no counternotice was received from the tenant in the five weeks following service of the review notice. This in fact happened, with G`s counternotice being issued after the specified five weeks. B was granted arrears of rent and G appealed claiming that time was not of the essence. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aBICKENHALL ENGINEERING CO LTD V GRANDMET RESTAURANTS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c52985 _d52985 |
||