| 000 | 01118cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38073 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u8573 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHubbard, C. | ||
| 245 | _aExtend or franchise - the Housing and Planning Act 1986 amendments | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v283(6348) 22 August 1987, 838-51(3) |
||
| 520 | _aThe Court of Appeal in Mosley v Hickman (1986) (See Abstract 36337) confirmed the Land Tribunal`s finding that tenants in the higher rateable value band enfranchising without first extending a lease would be required to pay considerably more for the freehold than those who had first exercised the right to an extended lease . The Housing and Planning Act 1986 s23 amended the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9 (1A) to exclude the effect of the Hickman approach and this article discusses the implications of this amendment, highlighting the anomalies which still exist. | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c5302 _d5302 |
||