000			01407cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS50905
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u952
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aForbuoys plc v Newport BC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 24 EG 156-157(2)
520			_aCC 21 October 1993. The parties agreed all terms of a new lease save certain provisions of the rent review clause. N contended that the rent at review should be upwards only. F sought an upwards or downwards clause. Held, a rent review clause upwards or downwards would not be unfair on the landlords and would be fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. N were ordered to pay the costs of F.
650	2	4	_aAMARJEE V BARROWFEN PROPERTIES LTD
650	2	4	_aBLYTHEWOOD PLANT HIRE LTD V SPIERS LTD
650	2	4	_aBOOTS THE CHEMISTS LTD V PINKLAND LTD
650	2	4	_aJANES (GOWNS) LTD V HARLOW DC
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1969
650	2	4	_aFORBUOYS PLC V NEWPORT BC
650	2	4	_aSTYLO SHOES LTD V MANCHESTER ROYAL EXCHANGE LTD
650	2	4	_aUPWARD ONLY RENT REVIEWS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-RENT REVIEW (COMMERCIAL LEASES)
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c531 _d531