000			01046cab a2200217 4500
001			X90122
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u84574
041			_aeng
245			_aEagleview v Worthgate Ltd and Capital Prime Properties Ltd
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aNew Property Cases _v[1998] NPC 26(3)
520			_aChD 12 February 1998. An action on a distant contract survives a challenge that the attempt to enforce it is an abuse of process. The court refuses to vacate Cautions under the Land Registration Act 1925, but forces the purchaser to bring the purchase price into court as a condition of proceeding. A technical nullity under the foreign law under which the plaintiff was incorporated is ignored. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - DO NOT PHOTOCOPY.
650			_aCONVEYANCING
650			_aEAGLEVIEW LTD V WORTHGATE LTD AND CAPITAL PRIME PROPERTIES PLC
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c27/02/1998
999			_c53159 _d53159