| 000 | 00960cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X90270 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u84730 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aShepherd v SoS Environment and Three Rivers DC | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1998] JPL 215-219(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 October 1997. Footpath - works undertaken to enable vehicular passage - enforcement notice - appeal to SoS - interpretation of Schedule 2, Part 2, Class B General Permitted Development Order 1995 - appeal dismissed - appeal to the High Court allowed - appeal to CA - relationship between GPDO and articel 8 of the GDPO - appeal allowed. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL. | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aFOOTPATH | ||
| 650 | _aSHEPHERD V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND THREE RIVERS DC | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c06/03/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c53283 _d53283 |
||