000			01335cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS58469
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u84955
041			_aeng
245			_aBarclays Bank plc v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[1998] 10 EG 159-166(8)
520			_aChD 9 October 1997. An application by the plaintiff mortgagee, Barclays Bank for relief from forfeiture of a lease of nightclub premises. Whether mortgagee as undertenant entitled to relief under Law of Property Act 1925 s146(4) and whether undertenant entitled to relief in respect of lease only without taking supplemental lease. Held, (1) The court did have jurisdiction under Law of Property Act 1925 s146(4) to grant relief from forfeiture to a mortgagee, as an undertenant (2) If the plaintiff were to seek relief from forfeiture, it must take the whole of the covenants contained in the supplemental lease as the terms on which it is entitled to relief from forfeiture of the original property.
650			_aDISCLAIMER OF LEASE
650			_aFORFEITURE OF LEASE
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146(4)
650			_aSUPPLEMENTAL LEASE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c17/03/1998
999			_c53412 _d53412