000			01497cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS36901
008			090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u968
041			_aeng
245			_aRank Xerox (UK) Ltd v Johnson (VO)
260			_c1986
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v279 (6301) 13 September 1986, p1096-1099 (3)
520			_aLVC(572-575/1984). These appeals relate to whether two office blocks, originally occupied separately, but now occupied by the appellant company for office use, were one hereditament. The appeals rose from three proposals made by Richard Ellis on the two blocks. In the first two proposals they sought an alteration in the valuation list and a reduction of the assessments on the grounds that they were incorrect and excessive. A further proposal was made saying that the "existing assessments should be merged and reduced" and "that the two buildings form one hereditament and the existing assessments are excessive, incorrect and bad in law." The Greater London Valuation Court decided the appeals resulting from the proposals on 31 January 1984, dismissing all three appeals and confirming the assessments in the valuation list. Rank Xerox, the appellant company appealed. The ratepayers contended that the appeal blocks were contiguous because they were touching. Alternatively, if they were not
650			_aOFFICES
650			_aUXBRIDGE
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c538 _d538