| 000 | 00876cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X91143 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u85609 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMarchday v Cafe Rouge | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v(1998) NPC 61. (2) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 3 April 1998. A property company which fails to get appropriate planning consents for the use of a garden as a proposed restaurant, finds that it is in breach of its agreement for a lease, and cannot force its `tenant` to accept the lease. Behaviour by the tenant, which might on a technical reading have itself constituted a breach, is construed purposively. HEADNOTE. | ||
| 650 |
_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252 |
||
| 650 | _aMARCHDAY V CAFE ROUGE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c16/04/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c53834 _d53834 |
||