| 000 | 00866cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X91191 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u85657 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMattey v Ervin | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v(1998) NPC 64, (3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 3 April 1998. Surrender of lease by operation of law is dependent upon estoppel and not the intention of the parties. Is acceptance of rent from the occupier and acquiescence in the possession of the premises by the occupier sufficient to give rise to an estoppel. Conduct of the parties only explicable on the basis that the original lease continued in existence. HEADNOTE. | ||
| 650 |
_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252 |
||
| 650 | _aMATTEY V ERVIN | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c17/04/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c53873 _d53873 |
||