| 000 | 00945cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58619 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u85794 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | _aOut of control | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9816) 18 April 1998, 134-135(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders three cases which demonstrate that a too-enthusiastic prosecution of listed building offences may result in a conviction being quashed on appeal. It may prepare the ground for an effective challenge by adducing evidence which goes beyond that necessary to establish offence. | ||
| 650 | _aJONES V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDING OFFENCES | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPROSECUTION | ||
| 650 | _aR V MADDON DC EX P PATTANI | ||
| 650 | _aR V SANDHU | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c24/04/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c53967 _d53967 |
||