| 000 | 01379cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58792 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86380 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Dudley Magistrates` Court ex parte Hollis; Hollis v Dudley MBC; Probert v Dudley MBC | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 18 EG 133-138(6) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 25 November 1997. H and P served notice on D of intention to bring proceedings against them if necessary remedial works were not carried out within 21 days to rectify a statutory nuisance. D promptly replied to say that the works would take longer than 21 days. Shortly after the expiry of this period, H and P commenced proceedings. Their costs were disallowed on the grounds that they had failed to give D proper opportunity to complete the works, and had acted unreasonably in their action. H and P`s appeal was allowed, and judicial review on adjournment of the case granted. | ||
| 650 | _aCOURT PROCEEDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACT 1990 S82 | ||
| 650 | _aHOLLIS V DUDLEY MBC | ||
| 650 | _aJUDICIAL REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aPROBERT V DUDLEY MBC | ||
| 650 | _aR V DUDLEY MAGISTRATES COURT | ||
| 650 | _aREMEDIAL WORKS | ||
| 650 | _aSTATUTORY NUISANCE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c26/05/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54366 _d54366 |
||