000			01250cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS58744
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u86471
041			_aeng
245			_aFox & Ridley v Guram and another
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aRent Review & Lease Renewal _v[1998] 2 RRLR 183-192(10)
520			_aQBD 3 October 1997. Landlords G served a notice requiring a rent review two days after the offical date, on shop premises leased by F. F failed a counternotice under the time limits expressed in the lease, but sought through appeal 1) declaration that G`s notice was defective because the date was misstated, G`s surveyors had no authority to serve notice, and the rent referred to was not the result of determination of the open market value, and 2) extension of time to serve counternotice to bring arbitration proceedings. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S12
650			_aCOUNTER NOTICE
650			_aEXTENSION OF TIME
650			_aFOX & RIDLEY V GURAM AND ANOTHER
650			_aMARKET RENT
650			_aOPEN MARKET VALUE
650			_aTRIGGER NOTICE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEW
942			_n0
948			_c29/05/1998
999			_c54431 _d54431