| 000 | 01072cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3420-44 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86487 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aInterpretation | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1998 EGCS 83 (23/5/98) |
||
| 520 | _a"Hale and others v Bellway Homes Ltd and others" ChD 12 May 1998. Purchasers` covenant of club and sports ground contained restriction that no part of ground could be used as a roadway, without written consent from vendor. Land surrounding club was sold to housebuilders. Whether convenant subject to implied proviso that consent should not be unreasonably withheld. Whether annexation formula sufficiently annexed the benefit of the convenant. Proviso could not be implied. | ||
| 650 | _aHALE AND OTHERS V BELLWAY HOMES LTD AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aINTERPRETATION | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSPORTS GROUNDS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c29/05/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54443 _d54443 |
||