000			01311cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS58748
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u86563
041			_aeng
245			_aViscount Chelsea and another v Hirshorn
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 20 EG 130-132(3)
520			_aWest London CC, 17 October 1997. Landlord H served a notice on 7 January 1997 to tenant V exercising the right to acquire a new lease of a flat. V`s solicitors signed the notice, specifying a date of 7 March 1997 by which H should respond. H`s solicitors contended that the notice was invalid because, 1) it did not comply with the Leasehold Reform, Housing & Urban Development Act 1993 s42(5) in that the specified date was less than two months after the date of the tenant`s notice, 2) it had been signed by V`s solicitors rather than the tenant themselves, and that in May 1997 V attempted to cure any defect by signing a document in the form of the January 7 notice and dating it January 1. "Held" notice invalid.
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42
650			_aVISCOUNT CHELSEA AND ANOTHER V HIRSHORN
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c03/06/1998
999			_c54492 _d54492