| 000 | 01343cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58743 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86599 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCrean Davidson Investments Ltd v Earl Cadogan and another | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 20 EG 136-138(3), (16/05/98) |
||
| 520 | _aCentral London CC, 11 December 1997. C acted for sublessees of flats in serving a section 13 notice under the Leasehold Reform and Housing Development Act 1993 for collective enfranchisement of the property. Landlords E did not accept the notice of claim was valid because 1) there was no proposed purchase price or reversionary interest in the headlease, 2) the headlease was a qualifying tenant, and as only two of the three subleassees made application, the necessary two thirds application had not been met. Held, application valid. | ||
| 650 | _aCOLLECTIVE ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCREAN DAVIDSON INVESTMENTS LTD V EARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aHEADLEASE | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aREVERSIONARY INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aSUBLEASE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c05/06/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54524 _d54524 |
||