| 000 | 00973cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58736 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86633 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aTaylor, P. | ||
| 245 | _aEnd of Rainbow case colours future rulings | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v63(6) 22 May 1998, 36(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders why in "Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold" the court ordered specific performance as an appropriate remedy against a tenant`s repair obligations, when so many other recent cases have been reluctant to impose such orders. | ||
| 650 | _aCO-OPERATIVE INSURANCE SOCIETY V ARGYLL STORES HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 |
_aDilapidations _96235 |
||
| 650 | _aRAINBOW ESTATES LTD V TOKENHOLD LTD | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIR OBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | ||
| 650 | _aTENANT DEFAULT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c08/06/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54553 _d54553 |
||