000			01194cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS38126
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u8836
041			_aeng
100			_aSims, J.
245			_aTrust your Arbitrator?
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v137(6322) 11 September 1987, 855-856(2)
520			_aThis article begins by outlining the problems which have been encountered with Arbitration Acts in the past, and looks at how the courts have themselves introduced restrictions as a solution to the number of time-wasting appeals which come to court. On this point, the author describes the Nema case, where the House of Lords laid down guidelines for the criteria to be met if leave to appeal was to be granted, highlighting standard form contracts and special restrictions for influential events. Concludes with a look at some important cases which have had an effect on arbitrations.
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1979
650			_aSUPREME COURT ACT 1981
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c5474 _d5474