| 000 | 01556cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58922 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86972 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd and another | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v(1998)24 EG 123-128(6) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 4 March 1998. The second defendant and his brother transferred the freehold of a Grade II listed building to V, a company owned by them. When a bank came to enforce its charge on the property in 1993, the brothers revealed the existence of two leases of the property each granted by V and containing a covenant by the tenant to repair the property demised. The defendants maintained that there was no obligation for the tenant to repair because the leases were subject to two agreements dated 17 November 1987 under which the repairs were to be the landlord`s responsibility, and applied to amend their defence to seek rectification of the repairing covenants. "Held" the applications to amend the defence were refused and an order for specific performance of the repairing covenants was granted. | ||
| 650 | _aCO-OPERATIVE INSURANCE SOCIETY LTD V ARGYLL STORES (HOLDINGS) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aJERVIS V HARRIS | ||
| 650 | _aNYKREDIT MORTGAGE BANK PLC V EDWARD ERDMAN GROUP LTD | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRS | ||
| 650 | _aSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c23/06/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54775 _d54775 |
||