| 000 | 01182cab a2200325 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52623 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u86993 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aRedman, P. | ||
| 245 | _aRating revaluation: is the outcome appealing? | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v139(8) 3 March 1995, 194(1) |
||
| 520 | _aAddresses three issues in connection with the revaluation: transitional arrangements and the burden for London businesses, the abolition of restriction on the timing of appeals and the new regulations designed to prevent minor refurbishment as a means of gaining immediate rate reductions. | ||
| 650 | _aAPPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS RATES | ||
| 650 | _aLONDON | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC RATING (CHARGEABLE AMOUNTS) REGULATIONS 1994 | ||
| 650 | _aPHASING | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT | ||
| 650 | _aRATING REVALUATION 1995 | ||
| 650 | _aSI 1994:3279 | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aTONE OF THE LIST | ||
| 650 | _aTRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c54795 _d54795 |
||