| 000 | 01146cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58914 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87049 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aSmith, Peter F. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA case for abrogation: the no-liability for unfitness principle | |
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aThe Conveyancer _v(62) May/June 1998, 189-201(13) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the current failure of the law to require landlords by means of implied convenant to let residential premises in a state fit for human habitation. Examines existing domestic reform proposals with special reference to US experience. References. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMON LAW | ||
| 650 | _aFIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION | ||
| 650 | _aISSA V HACKNEY LBC | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S11 | ||
| 650 | _aLAW COMMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aQUIET ENJOYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aRENT | ||
| 650 | _aRESIDENTIAL | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED STATES | ||
| 650 | _aWARRANTY OF HABITABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c26/06/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c54847 _d54847 |
||