000			01725cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS58938
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u87142
041			_aeng
245			_aBritish Aerospace Plc v SOS Environment and SOS Transport
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1998) 75 PCR 486-499(14)
520			_aQBD 13 June 1997. The applicants (B) sought planning permissin for an airport on land with an existing aviation-related use with a ceiling od 23,000 air traffic movements per year. A public inquiry was held in 1994 at which the inspector recommended refusal of the permission. B challenged the decision on the grounds that it was unlawful to take into account future increases in the scale of the airport when they had agreed to having their permitted development rights restricted and that it was not clear from the inspectors report how the finding of unacceptable noise intrusion related to the specific technical evidence or established critieria in PPG24. The application was dismissed on the grounds that the potential expansion of a proposal is capable of being a material cpmsideration in an appeal and that the Inspector was entitled to reach his own conclusions on the noise issue even if this conflicted with the technical evidence.
650			_aAIRPORTS
650			_aBRISTOL
650			_aBRITISH AEROSPACE PLS V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND SOS TRANSPORT
650			_aEXPANSION
650			_aFILTON
650			_aNOISE LEVELS
650			_aPERMITTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
650			_aPPG24
650			_aPUBLIC INQUIRY
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c02/07/1998
999			_c54929 _d54929