000			01651cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS58923
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u87165
041			_aeng
245			_aMartin v Maryland Estates Ltd
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 25 EG 169-171(3)
520			_aCA 16 February 1998. The appellant owned a building divided into two flats which were let on long leases. The appellant commenced proceedings for forfeiture for arrears due which were resolved on 20 July 1995 when consent orders were made setting out terms for payment. On 3 August 1995 the defendant served a notice under section 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 seeking collective enfranchisement. The appellant served a counternotice claiming that the section 13 notice was invalid as forfeiture proceedings were pending. Relief from forfeiture took effect on 21 December 1995 and the county court judge granted retrospective leave to serve the section 13 notice and upheld its validity. The appellant appealed. The appeal was allowed on the basis that on 3 August 1995 forfeiture proceedings were still pending, the defendant was not a qualifying tenant and was not therefore entitled to serve a section 13 notice.
650			_aCADOGAN V MCGIRK
650			_aCONSENT ORDER
650			_aENFRANCHISEMENT NOTICE
650			_aFORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S13
650			_aQUALIFYING TENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM
942			_n0
948			_c02/07/1998
999			_c54949 _d54949