000			01714cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS58921
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u87171
041			_aeng
245			_aFootwear Corporation Ltd v Amplight Properties Ltd
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1998) 25 EG 171-177(7)
520			_aChD 23 March 1998. F held a lease of business premises which included a provision not to underlet without the prior consent of the landlord., such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In November 1997 F wrote to A requesting consent to sublet and, enclosed accounts for the proposed assignee. A advised F by telephone later that month that consent would not be forthcoming and following a period of `without prejudice` discussions continued to withhold consent. F commenced proceedings to obtain a declaration of unreasonably withholding of landlord`s licence to underlet. "Held" if a landlord does not provide his reasons for refusing consent in writing within a reasonable time then he cannot rely on those reasons in court for justifying his withholding of consent. A failed to reply to the request to underlet within a reasonable time in writing. F was granted the delaration.
650			_aCONSENT TO SUBLET
650			_aDIMINUTION IN VALUE
650			_aKENED LTD V CONNIE INVESTMENTS LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1988
650			_aNORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V SHOPMOOR LTD
650			_aPROFITS TEST
650			_aREASONABLE TIME
650			_aREASONS IN WRITING
650			_aUSE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c02/07/1998
999			_c54955 _d54955